Streamlining the Admissions Process
Status message
Displaying output for plurality votingOpen Votes
I would like to propose a change in procedure to help streamlinethe
process of admission for a chronicle into OWBN.
After a Chronicle application is received, reviewed and voted
upon, they
enter the probationary period as already denoted in procedures.
At the end of this 6 months, barring any complaints from
neighboring
chronicles or major problems fitting into the WOD theme as
constructed by
OWBN the new chronicle be automatically granted full
membership. If problems do arise, a motion can be forwarded to the
Admissions Coordinator to Bar the Chronicle from Full Membership.
If the
motion to bar is passed, they must re-admit themselves after
working with
the Admissions/Orientation Coord's to smooth out the difficulties.
The tally of complaints and the time spent as a probationary member
would be
tracked by the Admissions Coord.
affiliate tracking urlダンク , Fullress , スニーカー発売日 抽選情報 ニュースを掲載!ナイキ ジョーダン ダンク シュプリーム SUPREME 等のファッション情報を配信!
Chronicle/Position | Voted for | Comment |
---|---|---|
New York City, NY - USA, Kings of New York | For | Having spent the last 4 months dealing with the current admission rules Ihave to say that I am highly in favor of a faster and less beauraucratic method. |
Saint Paul, MN - USA, Obsidian Towers | For | Looks good to me |
Berkeley, CA - USA, Wasting the Dawn | For | |
Milwaukee, WI - USA, Nocturnal Rapture | For | |
Tampa, FL - USA, Tampa Bay by Night | For | |
Chicago, IL - USA, Dark Requiem | For | |
San Francisco, CA - USA, Always Comes Evening | For | |
Fargo, ND - USA, Within Shadow's Reach | For | |
Cleveland, OH - USA, Carpe Noctum | For | I have heard complaints from Chronicles that applied and were essentiallyleft in the dark. SO anything to streamline and give potential chronicles more information is a positive thing. |
Cincinnati, OH - USA, Shadows of Cincinnati | For | I proposed this...go figure I would vote yes! >:-) |
Columbus, OH - USA, Columbus in Darkness | For | I am for *anything* that reduces the number of e-mails in my inbox on agiven day. This is a good start. |
Springfield, IL - USA, Capitol City Cauldron | Against | there have been many chronicles that have enough issues that we are notadmitting into for full membership. the votes coming back up for full membership allow us to become more aware of any issues that may not come up otherwise. we need to atleast need to have notification of these upcoming deadlines to make people aware they need to soon express any concerns they may have yet not mentioned. |
Washington, DC - USA, Shadows on the Mall | For | I'm all in favor. Here's a level of trust I DO feel comfortable with, and amore positive way to welcome chronicles to OWBN. |
Kenosha, WI - USA, Memento Mori | For | While I can see some problems arising from this process, I can see moregood coming from it. With any luck, we can get this down to as simple as a smile and a nod. |
Gimli, MB - Canada, Sang Nordique | For | In the case where neighbouring games have issues, I am sure they will bebrought up to Council. Other than that, why make a game suffer through yet another vote? Why bog the Council list down even more? A second vote should only be held when there are concerns, otherwise it's a needless excercise. |
Northern Virginia, VA - USA, Night Falls | For | Reasonable proposal, and still leaves a way to dismiss a chronicle thatdoes not play well with others |
Annapolis, MD - USA, Vitae Aeternus | Abstain | I'd vote yes for this, but I think that it is important that Council begiven notification that the 6 months are due to be up beforehand, and this isn't spelled out in the proposal. |
Edwardsville, IL - USA, Caught in Eternal Twilight | For | Less Beaurocracy the better. |
AHC 1 | For | Less bureaucracy is *always* best. In this case, it just cuts down ongeneral online paperwork. But Council will have to monitor much better than it does now, so that new chronicles don't get ignored for their initial probationary time. |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | Anything I can do to help the organization run more smoothly and reduce theamount of bureacracy? Hell yeah, sign me up. |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | Anything I can do to help the organization run more smoothly and reduce theamount of bureacracy? Hell yeah, sign me up. |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | Abstain | |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | Abstain | |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | We still get to voice concerns and call for a vote if needed. |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | We still get to voice concerns and call for a vote if needed. |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | Good idea |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | Good idea |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | Though I understand the argument that prevented us from becoming anofficial game, it took far too long for it to happen. I would hate for the same thing to happen to another legitimate game. |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | Though I understand the argument that prevented us from becoming anofficial game, it took far too long for it to happen. I would hate for the same thing to happen to another legitimate game. |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | Streamlining is good. I don't think the previous wasy was bad, but I dothink this new way is better. |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | Streamlining is good. I don't think the previous wasy was bad, but I dothink this new way is better. |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | Abstain | I don't have any problems with either method |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | Abstain | I don't have any problems with either method |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | For |