Any Antitribu of a Bloodline
Status message
Displaying output for plurality votingOpen Votes
Proposal Type: Bylaw Revision
Opened: 08-Mar-2001 1:00AM EST
Closing: 09-Mar-2001 1:00AM EST
This category is up for line item vote for inclusion or exclusion from our comprehensive R&U list. Since many people have a different view of what is R&U, and what the question What is R&U? means, we will leave it verysimple. Please include ALL comments below.
Category: Any Antitribu of a Bloodline
Meaning: Any Sabbat members of any of the non-sabbat bloodlines.(Including Samedi, Daughters of Cacophony, etc.)
Coord s Recommendation: R&U, approval required for PCs, notification required for NPCs
Please remember, if any category is considered R&U in any way, shape or form, the character, PC or NPC, regardless of Council s involvement, must be registered with the R&U Coord.
latest jordansNike Air Max 270 Black Gold Shoes Best Price AH8050-007 – Buy Best Price Adidas&Nike Sport Sneakers
File / Document: No file attachments for this vote.
Ballot Options R&U:
R&U:
R&U:
R&U:
R&U:
R&U:
R&U:
Not
Abstain
R&U:
1 out of 160 eligible voters cast their ballot
R&U:
78% (50 votes)
Not
16% (10 votes)
Abstain
6% (4 votes)
R&U:
0% (0 votes)
R&U:
0% (0 votes)
R&U:
0% (0 votes)
R&U:
0% (0 votes)
R&U:
0% (0 votes)
R&U:
0% (0 votes)
R&U:
0% (0 votes)
| Chronicle/Position | Voted for | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| New York City, NY - USA, Kings of New York | Not | Sabbat members of a bloodline ARE NOT the definition of an Antitribu of a bloodline. The bloodlines are, as a rule, inependent. Therefore, and member of a bloodline who is not Independent should fall into the category of ''Antitribu''. If ''Antitribu'' of a bloodline are R&U then Camarilla members of the bloodlines should be R&U as well. |
| Berkeley, CA - USA, Wasting the Dawn | R&U: | |
| Milwaukee, WI - USA, Nocturnal Rapture | Not | SECT AFFLIATION SHOULD NOT BE A REASON FOR BEING R&U IT SHOULD BE THE CHARACTERS CHOICE. |
| Tampa, FL - USA, Tampa Bay by Night | R&U: | |
| Norwalk, CT - USA, Rails of Revolution | R&U: | |
| San Francisco, CA - USA, Always Comes Evening | R&U: | |
| Cleveland, OH - USA, Carpe Noctum | Not | I'm voting Not R&U because I feel this is terribly inappropriate and agree with Kenosha etc. We should be voting on DoC, Samedi etc seperately as a whole bloodline, not as a particular sect. |
| Cincinnati, OH - USA, Shadows of Cincinnati | Abstain | Abstainance makes the heart grow yonder. |
| Springfield, IL - USA, Capitol City Cauldron | R&U: | |
| Washington, DC - USA, Shadows on the Mall | R&U: | |
| Kenosha, WI - USA, Memento Mori | Not | Wow, Kenosha and Milwaukee agree!?! This means the end is near. But seriously, Sect affiliation shouldn't be something that makes a character R&U. |
| Gimli, MB - Canada, Sang Nordique | R&U: | |
| Iowa City, IA - USA, L'Ange Noir | R&U: | |
| Northern Virginia, VA - USA, Night Falls | R&U: | |
| Annapolis, MD - USA, Vitae Aeternus | R&U: | Bloodlines themselves are rare. |
| Edwardsville, IL - USA, Caught in Eternal Twilight | Not | Sect affiliation should not determine R&U status. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | Abstain | Argued persuasively enough that we can't make up our minds. There are a number of good points brought up in the comments on this. Bloodlines should be considered as a whole, though, rather than ''antitribu'' or not. Revised Edition has removed most of the difference between regular Clans/Bloodlines and their antitribus anyway, so it's prob'ly better to argue Bloodlines as a whole. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | Abstain | Argued persuasively enough that we can't make up our minds. There are a number of good points brought up in the comments on this. Bloodlines should be considered as a whole, though, rather than ''antitribu'' or not. Revised Edition has removed most of the difference between regular Clans/Bloodlines and their antitribus anyway, so it's prob'ly better to argue Bloodlines as a whole. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | R&U: |