14th and 15th Gen Inceptors Unusual R&U
Status message
Displaying output for plurality votingOpen Votes
Proposal Type: Bylaw Revision
Opened: 20-Jan-2006 1:00AM EST
Closing: 21-Jan-2006 1:00AM EST
I propose to place 14th and 15th generation Caitiff/Pander Inceptors under the Unusual category of R&U.
14th and 15th generation Caitiff/Pander Inceptors shall be defined as Caitiff/Panders that possess a unusual/uniquely created discipline in clan. The unusual/unique discipline created shall be defined as an "Inceptor discipline". This discipline shall be considered one of thier 3 "in clan" disciplines, however it will be considered "out of clan" for teaching purposes. 14th and 15th generation Caitiff/Pander may only learn and possess one "Inceptor Discipline".
Russell Noratel
CM Vitae Aeternus: SMD
Buy KicksKyrie Irving Shoes
File / Document: No file attachments for this vote.
Ballot Options Against
For
Abstain
Abstain
1 out of 159 eligible voters cast their ballot
Against
48% (22 votes)
For
30% (14 votes)
Abstain
22% (10 votes)
Abstain
0% (0 votes)
Chronicle/Position | Voted for | Comment |
---|---|---|
Los Angeles, CA - USA, La Sangre De Los Angeles | For | |
Saint Paul, MN - USA, Obsidian Towers | For | |
Iowa City, IA - USA, Fields of Rage | Against | |
Cleveland, OH - USA, Under an Eerie Moon | Abstain | Not a Werewolf issue |
Philadelphia, PA - USA, Nusquam | Against | |
Fredericksburg, VA - USA, Caine's Chosen: Liberty in Death | Against | I like that it is in clan but cannot be taught but I dislike the wording enough to vote against it. Perhaps if it were rephrased with a higher RnU catagory our game would vote for it. At the minimum I would like to have some control or knowledge about the inceptor itself. |
Winona, MN - USA, Winona Dark Haven | Against | |
Auburn, CA - USA, Lux Tenebras | Abstain | |
San Francisco, CA - USA, Always Comes Evening | Abstain | |
Atlanta, GA - USA, Whispers of Atlanta | Against | |
Fargo, ND - USA, Within Shadow's Reach | For | |
Cincinnati, OH - USA, Shadows of Cincinnati | Against | |
Washington, DC - USA, Shadows on the Mall | Against | Baltimore and Kenosha have said it best thus far. As long as this proposal reflects a blanket acceptance of any and all future Inceptor Disciplines, SotM will be against it. |
Phoenix, AZ - USA, Secundus Surrectum | For | |
Kenosha, WI - USA, Memento Mori | Against | We've recently had an Inceptor discipline that was voted down by Council. This Proposal would allow that same discipline to enter the network without even being voted upon.Any Council Member that saw fit to vote against an Inceptor discipline should be voting against this proposal. |
Iowa City, IA - USA, L'Ange Noir | For | I don't see how intercepter disciplines threaten us when we have final control of our games. |
Annapolis, MD - USA, Vitae Aeternus | For | This prop is a reasonable way to allow inceptor characters into those chronicles that are willing to have them. |
Edwardsville, IL - USA, Caught in Eternal Twilight | For | This prop fixes a lot of potential wonk with Inceptor powers, and it has some very useful fixes. If you don't want Inceptors in your game, don't allow them. I doubt our game will use them any time in the near futures (since our players like being Camarilla and hate Catiff), but this will work fine for the games that want to use them. |
Baltimore, MD - USA, Dark Harbor | Against | |
AHC 1 | Abstain | |
AHC 2 | Against | I think you can see my comments on Council. Ian |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | Abstain | |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | Abstain | |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | Against | |
Chronicle/Position Unknown | Against |