Change of Bylaw in election of Coordinators
Status message
Displaying output for plurality votingOpen Votes
Proposal Type: Bylaw Revision
Opened: 11-Jan-2001 1:00AM EST
Closing: 11-Jan-2001 1:00AM EST
That Article 1, section 2 "Coordinators", 2, which currently reads,
"2. All other Coordinators will be appointed by the Head Coordinator and
must be approved by a majority vote of the Council. "
shall be amended to read:
"2. All other Coordinators will be nominated by the Head Coordinator, who
shall nominate no fewer than two applicants for each Coordinator position.
The Head Coordinator may indicate which of the two nominees is preferred.
These nominees shall be voted on by Council, with the nominee carying the
majority becoming Coord, unless the majority chooses to reject all of the
Head Coordinator's nominees."
Nike air jordan SneakersShop Sneakers in Footwear
File / Document: No file attachments for this vote.
Ballot Options For
Abstain
Against
1 out of 160 eligible voters cast their ballot
For
88% (56 votes)
Against
9% (6 votes)
Abstain
3% (2 votes)
| Chronicle/Position | Voted for | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| New York City, NY - USA, Kings of New York | For | |
| Berkeley, CA - USA, Wasting the Dawn | For | |
| Milwaukee, WI - USA, Nocturnal Rapture | For | |
| Tampa, FL - USA, Tampa Bay by Night | For | |
| Chicago, IL - USA, Dark Requiem | For | We've hated the way it has been done in the pass, and we think thisis a much better way. |
| Winona, MN - USA, Winona Dark Haven | For | |
| Norwalk, CT - USA, Rails of Revolution | For | |
| Fargo, ND - USA, Within Shadow's Reach | For | Almost looks to be a ''political correctness'' motion, but looks okay to me. I have less backing for a negative vote than for a positive vote. |
| Cincinnati, OH - USA, Shadows of Cincinnati | For | Nice job, it smooths the thing out, and makes the headaches go away...nowall I have to do is find my pants! >:-) |
| Columbus, OH - USA, Columbus in Darkness | For | *shrug* If I like the candidate, I'll vote for them. If I don't, then itsNOTA. If I have no bearing on the vote, then I'll abstain. Makes no difference to me how many people are on the ballot, but if it'll get Nader on, then I'm for it. |
| Springfield, IL - USA, Capitol City Cauldron | For | |
| Washington, DC - USA, Shadows on the Mall | For | Absolutely. What else can I say? |
| Kenosha, WI - USA, Memento Mori | For | |
| Gimli, MB - Canada, Sang Nordique | Against | There is nothing wrong with the way it is now, except for maybe someperception issues and we all know how selective they can be.... |
| Iowa City, IA - USA, L'Ange Noir | Against | If there is only one person the Head Coordinator is comfortable with havingthe position then the Head Coordinator should be allowed to present that. If the choice of the head Coordinator is unacceptable then the Reject all candidates should be used. We ellect the Head Coordinator as somebody who we can trust and have faith in their decisions. |
| Northern Virginia, VA - USA, Night Falls | For | During the last coord elections several of my players commented on theperceived lack of choices among candidates. This won't stop the HC for getting the candiate they prefer to work with, only provide a better choice than none of the above. |
| Annapolis, MD - USA, Vitae Aeternus | Abstain | My ony concern is when there is only one applicant. |
| Edwardsville, IL - USA, Caught in Eternal Twilight | For | |
| AHC 1 | For | Choice. That is the key. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | Sounds good to me. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | Sounds good to me. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | I perfer the option of A or B or neither to A or nothing any day. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | I perfer the option of A or B or neither to A or nothing any day. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | Against | I see no reason to strip the HC of whom they wish to work with.The coord's were intended to be like the Cabnet, right. The HC's people that help her/him. I am happy as a councilor to reject when theres a problem, but we elect the HC for a reason. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | Against | I see no reason to strip the HC of whom they wish to work with.The coord's were intended to be like the Cabnet, right. The HC's people that help her/him. I am happy as a councilor to reject when theres a problem, but we elect the HC for a reason. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | If the HC and AHC proposed it, Helle's Belles yeah. I'm thirsty. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | If the HC and AHC proposed it, Helle's Belles yeah. I'm thirsty. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For |