Removal of Coordinator Bylaw 3/C/iii/1

In order to streamline the Coordinator proposal process, I am proposing thefollowing change to Coordinator Bylaw 3)C)iii)1. This is not designed to be
"extra voting" silliness, but to give CM's the chance to decide whether or
not the "auto-pass" concept is worth keeping at this time, which I view is a
seperate issue from the previous proposal I just made.

This proposal would remove the following text:

Coordinator Bylaw 3)C)iii) ..."and these proposals need not be seconded, but
go immediately into discussion."

Coordinator Bylaw 3)C)iii)1) If no opposition is voiced during the week of
discussion, the proposal is considered passed and enforceable. Once passed
these are considered binding to all.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Current:
=-=-=-=-=
Coordinator Bylaws
3) Coordinator Duties
C) Genre Coordinators
iii) Genre Coordinators must pass before Council any plot, enforced policy,
or binding edict they wish to use which they can reasonably expect to affect
multiple chronicles and these proposals need not be seconded, but go
immediately into discussion.
(1) If no opposition is voiced during the week of discussion, the proposal
is considered passed and enforceable. Once passed these are considered
binding to all.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Proposed New:
=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Coordinator Bylaws
3) Coordinator Duties
C) Genre Coordinators
iii) Genre Coordinators must pass before Council any plot, enforced policy,
or binding edict they wish to use which they can reasonably expect to affect
multiple chronicles.
spy offersAir Jordan 1 Mid "What The Multi-Color" For Sale