Character Regulation Bylaw 9.b.iv: Dark Thaum Grandfathering Time Limit
Status message
Displaying output for plurality votingOpen Votes
Proposal Type: Bylaw Revision
Opened: 02-Aug-2006 1:00AM EDT
Closing: 03-Aug-2006 1:00AM EDT
Add the following to to Character Regulation Bylaw 9.b.iv:Characters with Dark Thaumaturgy or other Infernal Investments.
"Grandfathering" for this proposal
Chronicles will have thirty (30) days after this proposal passes to Notify Council (PC) or Log with Archivist (NPC) any character with Dark Thaumaturgy or other Infernal Investments. After thirty (30) days, any character not Notified or Logged will be in violation of Character Regulation Bylaw 9.b.iv.
File / Document: No file attachments for this vote.
Ballot Options Against
For
Abstain
1 out of 155 eligible voters cast their ballot
For
61% (34 votes)
Against
36% (20 votes)
Abstain
4% (2 votes)
| Chronicle/Position | Voted for | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| St. Petersburg, FL - USA, Faces of Change | Against | |
| St. Louis, MO - USA, Shadows of St. Louis | For | |
| Los Angeles, CA - USA, La Sangre De Los Angeles | For | |
| Saint Paul, MN - USA, Obsidian Towers | For | this just makes sense. We're for making sense. |
| Iowa City, IA - USA, Fields of Rage | For | |
| Stockton, CA - USA, Stockton by Night | For | Yay spam |
| Milwaukee, WI - USA, Nocturnal Rapture | For | |
| Tampa, FL - USA, Tampa Bay by Night | Against | See Baltimore and S.O.A.P. |
| Philadelphia, PA - USA, Nusquam | Against | |
| Chicago, IL - USA, Dark Requiem | Against | After we thought about it, Infernalism is better in the WoD when nobody knows who has it. We also don't think this proposal is going to have a significant deterrent effect on players getting Dark Thaum such that it would warrant everyone knowing OOC who's gone infernal. |
| Indianapolis, IN - USA, Stars Never Rise | For | Common sense good. |
| Norwalk, CT - USA, Rails of Revolution | For | |
| Fargo, ND - USA, Within Shadow's Reach | For | |
| Dayton, OH - USA, Dying Embers | Against | |
| Macon, GA - USA, Stolen Hours | Abstain | Having no infernalists [YES!], I just don't care. |
| Cincinnati, OH - USA, Shadows of Cincinnati | For | |
| Columbus, OH - USA, Columbus in Darkness | Against | It's not that we like Infernalism, even though babies are excellent for breakfast. It's more unneccessary work for the archivist, about something that should be pretty secretive anyway. |
| Gary, IN - USA, Shattered Souls | For | See Stockton |
| Washington, DC - USA, Shadows on the Mall | Against | |
| Phoenix, AZ - USA, Secundus Surrectum | For | |
| Gimli, MB - Canada, Sang Nordique | For | |
| Iowa City, IA - USA, L'Ange Noir | For | |
| Annapolis, MD - USA, Vitae Aeternus | Against | See C&A |
| Bradenton, FL - USA, Chaos & Entropy | Against | One vote for black magic slipping under the radar, the way it was intended to be. :) |
| Baltimore, MD - USA, Dark Harbor | Against | |
| AHC 1 | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | Infernalists should at least be as rare as Rouge Thaumaturges. In response to CiD; if it adds that much work for the Archivist then perhaps there is too much Infernalism within the Org. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | Infernalists should at least be as rare as Rouge Thaumaturges. In response to CiD; if it adds that much work for the Archivist then perhaps there is too much Infernalism within the Org. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For |