Creation of an OWBN Red List
Status message
Displaying output for plurality votingOpen Votes
Proposal Type: Bylaw Revision
Opened: 29-May-2001 1:00AM EDT
Closing: 05-Jun-2001 1:00AM EDT
If a PC becomes so dangerous as to gain the attention of the Inner Council (read Council ooc), then Council may vote to red list this individual. There can never be more than 13 individuals, PC or NPC, on this list. This PC must already be universally or globally bloodhunted.
The Red List would be comprised of OWBN's Most Wanted List, to be handled in game, although the Justicars and their NPCs may also hunt these individuals, by following already established guidelines for such.
If STs wish to bring in an NPC redlisted individual to play, for plot reasons, the redlisted individual would be considered R&U for these purposes. The proposal must be run through the R&U Coordinator's office, just like any other R&U character proposal, AND must have a definite period for appearing. No redlisted NPC individual must ever become a chronicle's NPC, and solely reside under the jurisdiction of Council.
File / Document: No file attachments for this vote.
Ballot Options For
Abstain
Against
1 out of 160 eligible voters cast their ballot
For
70% (32 votes)
Abstain
22% (10 votes)
Against
9% (4 votes)
| Chronicle/Position | Voted for | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Saint Paul, MN - USA, Obsidian Towers | For | |
| Berkeley, CA - USA, Wasting the Dawn | Abstain | |
| Chicago, IL - USA, Dark Requiem | For | |
| Winona, MN - USA, Winona Dark Haven | For | |
| Norwalk, CT - USA, Rails of Revolution | For | |
| San Francisco, CA - USA, Always Comes Evening | For | |
| Cleveland, OH - USA, Carpe Noctum | For | Everyone should note that this is based on the new bloodhunt law passing. If it does then it requires already that 75% of the domains bloodhunt the individual, or that council passes a global bloodhunt via a vote. |
| Columbus, OH - USA, Columbus in Darkness | For | |
| Springfield, IL - USA, Capitol City Cauldron | Abstain | |
| Kenosha, WI - USA, Memento Mori | For | |
| Iowa City, IA - USA, L'Ange Noir | For | |
| Northern Virginia, VA - USA, Night Falls | Abstain | |
| AHC 1 | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | Against | The right of individual games to run their own story lines is compromised with this bylaw. It gives individual games a OOC political tool to take out characters they don't like in other games. Add a claus stating that only CMs from the home game of the prospective Red Listed character may propose a character for the Red list, and I will think about voting yes. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | Against | The right of individual games to run their own story lines is compromised with this bylaw. It gives individual games a OOC political tool to take out characters they don't like in other games. Add a claus stating that only CMs from the home game of the prospective Red Listed character may propose a character for the Red list, and I will think about voting yes. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | I am behind having a definate flavor of Just OWbN, and this will add to that in my opnion. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | I am behind having a definate flavor of Just OWbN, and this will add to that in my opnion. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | Abstain | I'd like to see some safeguards built into this, such as a vast majority of Domains already hunting the individual as well as at least 2/3 Council vote to put someone on it. The WoD red list is the very worst of the worst. Not merely Sabbat, not merely diablerists, not merely infernalists, they are absolute monsters among monsters. I'd also like to see us follow what's written about them in that when the above safeguard measures are satisfied, it should be brought up by two justicars at least, and a conclave called for the purpose of placing them on the list. Any move to put someone on this list should be a major event that makes ripples throughout the whole of the Camarilla. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | Abstain | I'd like to see some safeguards built into this, such as a vast majority of Domains already hunting the individual as well as at least 2/3 Council vote to put someone on it. The WoD red list is the very worst of the worst. Not merely Sabbat, not merely diablerists, not merely infernalists, they are absolute monsters among monsters. I'd also like to see us follow what's written about them in that when the above safeguard measures are satisfied, it should be brought up by two justicars at least, and a conclave called for the purpose of placing them on the list. Any move to put someone on this list should be a major event that makes ripples throughout the whole of the Camarilla. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | Abstain | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | Abstain | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | I do not see how this ruins individual plotlines as anyone nominated to the Red List must come through the council. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | I do not see how this ruins individual plotlines as anyone nominated to the Red List must come through the council. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | Against | Add a claus stating that only CMs from the home game of the prospective Red Listed character may propose a character for the Red list, and I will think about voting yes. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | Against | Add a claus stating that only CMs from the home game of the prospective Red Listed character may propose a character for the Red list, and I will think about voting yes. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For |