[Proposal] Removal of Administrative Bylaw 3.A.v.1.a.
As CM of Winchester: Sins in the Valley, I propose that we remove subsection a. from Administrative Bylaw 3.A.v.1., as copied and highlighted below:
v. Administrative Bylaw Changes
- Administrative Coordinators may pass before Council any changes to the administrative bylaws, as long as said changes directly affect their position. These proposals need not be seconded, but go immediately into discussion.
- If no opposition is voiced during the week of discussion, the bylaw is considered passed and enforceable. Once passed these bylaws are considered binding to all chronicles (as with any other bylaw) and a chronicles refusal to adhere to said bylaw is grounds for OWBN disciplinary measures. Opposition must be in regards to the content of the proposal and must give those reasons why the objection is voiced. This is to allow Coordinator's the opportunity to respond and/or make changes/remove the proposal and its contents.
Reason: It is the viewpoint of this chronicle's staff that changes to the Administrative Bylaws should go to vote. Beyond that, the line as to what would fall under this and what would not is highly subjective; an undesirable trait in any body of law.
CM, Winchester, VA: Sins in the Valley