Ability of Justicars to make decisions at Conclaves
Status message
Displaying output for plurality votingOpen Votes
Proposal Type: Bylaw Revision
Opened: 30-Aug-2001 1:00AM EDT
Closing: 05-Sep-2001 1:00AM EDT
PROPOSAL: Authored by: Dennis Sharpe, and Carrie Matras
Since Conclaves are generally two night events (at least), the first night would be to hear the issues being brought before the Justicariate. The next day would be used to meet with the STs of the event, discuss the issues, and give the Coords an equal voice in deciding the outcome. The second night of the event would be used for carrying out what is decided by the STs and Coords jointly.
The order of events should be roughly as follows:
1st Night : The first part of the night should be selecting Clan Reps (Assuming the clan reps arenNike air jordan SneakersTHE SNEAKER BULLETIN
File / Document: No file attachments for this vote.
Ballot Options For
Abstain
Against
1 out of 160 eligible voters cast their ballot
For
93% (50 votes)
Abstain
7% (4 votes)
Against
0% (0 votes)
| Chronicle/Position | Voted for | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| New York City, NY - USA, Kings of New York | For | |
| Berkeley, CA - USA, Wasting the Dawn | For | |
| Milwaukee, WI - USA, Nocturnal Rapture | For | Sure why not |
| Tampa, FL - USA, Tampa Bay by Night | For | |
| Fredericksburg, VA - USA, Caine's Chosen: Liberty in Death | For | Oooh, let the players control the Conclave... I like |
| Norwalk, CT - USA, Rails of Revolution | For | |
| Fargo, ND - USA, Within Shadow's Reach | For | |
| Cleveland, OH - USA, Carpe Noctum | For | God forbid we should trust duly elected coords to exercise good judgement and play within the NPCs that they can portray. The unwritten part of this is that Council can always negate these afterwards. Additionally I would be very surprised if details of the conclave didn't make it to the ST/Council lists shortly after the conclave. |
| Cincinnati, OH - USA, Shadows of Cincinnati | For | This is the kind of unwritten rule we used to use, and if it takes placing it as a written rule to get things moving again, it is way past time. |
| Columbus, OH - USA, Columbus in Darkness | For | |
| Springfield, IL - USA, Capitol City Cauldron | For | As has already been said. If something gets decided it can always get changed by council if need be. This will help put the game back in the hands of the players. |
| Washington, DC - USA, Shadows on the Mall | For | |
| Iowa City, IA - USA, L'Ange Noir | For | |
| Northern Virginia, VA - USA, Night Falls | For | To counter BoB's point as with any decision made in owbn all it take is one proposal, and a second to require a vote for the council to ratify or scrap the issue. As proposed this will allow for ''on the spot'' decisions to be made at conclaves, almost like how it should work. Of course, this is assuming we have any coords left to attend a conclave. |
| Annapolis, MD - USA, Vitae Aeternus | For | |
| AHC 1 | For | I have always felt that players and Coords alike should have more input on how the game goes, and what decisions are made |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | Abstain | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | Abstain | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | I proposed this, and I still stand behind it. It will open doors for Coords to talk to STs on an equal footing, and both have a say on the issues brought to them, on the fly, at a conclave. I can see no way we can't have this. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | I proposed this, and I still stand behind it. It will open doors for Coords to talk to STs on an equal footing, and both have a say on the issues brought to them, on the fly, at a conclave. I can see no way we can't have this. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | Abstain | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | Abstain | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | As long as there aren't anymore bans on the Amaranth, I'm all for it! |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | As long as there aren't anymore bans on the Amaranth, I'm all for it! |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | While this is mainly a Vampire issue, it could potentiallyaffect Garou (At lest one Justicar has made decisions regarding Garou in the past). This is a balanced proposal, and would allow the Garou Coordinator, if s/he is present and relevant, to have input if any such decisions are on the floor. Coordinators ought to be allowed to do their jobs, or why have them in the first place? The power of the Council remains intact, we elect the Coordinators, and would get a vote if we happen to be at the Conclave. If the Coordinators aren't trusted to make good decisions, they should simply be replaced with trustworthy individuals. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | While this is mainly a Vampire issue, it could potentiallyaffect Garou (At lest one Justicar has made decisions regarding Garou in the past). This is a balanced proposal, and would allow the Garou Coordinator, if s/he is present and relevant, to have input if any such decisions are on the floor. Coordinators ought to be allowed to do their jobs, or why have them in the first place? The power of the Council remains intact, we elect the Coordinators, and would get a vote if we happen to be at the Conclave. If the Coordinators aren't trusted to make good decisions, they should simply be replaced with trustworthy individuals. |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For | |
| Chronicle/Position Unknown | For |